Tranlsate German to English - Click here to open Altavista's Babel Fish Translator Click here to learn about all those symbols by people's names.

leftlogo.jpg (20709 bytes)




Moderators: Mike McAlvanah
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 

Posted
I recently acquired this dagger and am curious as to its value. It is in very nice condition, especially the blade, with its nice needle point and nearly 100% gray etching backgrounds. The grip has a few dings, but no chips, cracks, etc. It appears to be made of ebony or another wood used late in the period for "RZM" SS daggers. The guards are nickel-silver and appropriately marked internally for the "K&M" daggers. The scabbard is the standard "RZM" type, painted black, with plated fittings. There is a black "RZM" hanger attached. The scabbard paint is original and rates at about 99%. No dings, creases, etc. I would appreciate informed estimates of its value. Thanks very much.

 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Mid-South, USA | Registered: 30 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Motto

 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Mid-South, USA | Registered: 30 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Grip

 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Mid-South, USA | Registered: 30 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
I thought by 1939 the makers had settled on gold or copper washed fittings on marine daggers. I have seen a few early pieces that claim to be early marine daggers. They had black handles, but they had early maker marks. Could I see a close up of the entire grip.
I recently posted a Klittermann&Moog with same mark as yours. My cross guards were not marked inside.

Randal.
 
Posts: 308 | Registered: 17 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
There is no sign of a gold or copper wash on this dagger. I would think by 1939, such washes would have been scarce, if they existed at all. Perhaps someone has such a dagger with the wash. I don't know. The eagle is aluminum. The grip perfectly fits the guards. The fit of the blade to the lower guard is well within acceptable tolerances and nearly perfect. K&M is known to have used nickel-silver guards and scabbard fittings well into the "RZM" period. I would not be surprised to find 1939 daggers by K&M to have a mixture of parts, including crossguards. Here is a shot of the entire front of the grip, as requested.

 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Mid-South, USA | Registered: 30 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
I should also mention there is no "Gau" mark on the lower guard.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Mid-South, USA | Registered: 30 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Here is a RZM period NSKK Marine. Although it's not a K&M. It's marked M7/66 1939 for Eickhorn.

Randal.
 
Posts: 308 | Registered: 17 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
#1

 
Posts: 308 | Registered: 17 April 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Nice example. The "Eickhorn" leaders daggers often have the copper wash. Of course, 1939 covers an entire year and a lot could change in that time, especially that year. My dagger is an out-of-the-woodwork example. I had to "unfreeze" the pommel nut when I obtained it. I have no doubt it is "unmessed with." It could be it had a light wash of copper on it and it was removed by polishing, etc. However, since I can see no trace of wash, I think it more likely it came from the factory as seen.
 
Posts: 1720 | Location: Mid-South, USA | Registered: 30 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


Site images not be used without our written permission.

Click to Visit