I have followed this topic about the evidence which seems to prove a piece of skull was not Hitlers. When it turned to a couple of comments that were deemed as against the COC they were asked "please" not do that again.
However, as a new member I made a comment about members of the white house and I get a personal email warning me I would be suspended if I did it again.
My question is why did I not get the same respect as members who have been longer than I.

Bf 109,
Perhaps they also got an email from the staff with the same stern warning. I'm only speculating but sometimes we need to be sure we have all the facts and understand the totality of the incident before making judgements on the perceived disparity of discipline. I volunteer on another forum to help out, and the question has been posed to staff over there. It's often premature to assert that there was preferential treatment when infact specific issues and outcomes of disciplinary action are not shared with the general membership. I have no knowledge about the specifics of your issue nor the issue with the 2 members you referenced. As such, I am only posing a plausible explanation of what may have happened. That's between the members you referenced, and the forums staff/administration.

T

i was barred without warning from one forum, you got a warning at least, we are all good guys here for the most, but we sometimes inadvertantly type something another member feels upset by, the mods here have a tough time 109, dont take it personal mate. i ,for one appreciate a tough disipline on a forum, im the worlds worst for indisipline, but when im here, i respect the code.dave does his best to please us all i feel

Thanks guys, points well taken.