Tranlsate German to English - Click here to open Altavista's Babel Fish Translator Click here to learn about all those symbols by people's names.

leftlogo.jpg (20709 bytes)




Moderators: Jareth Holub
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 

Posted
A local shop has a Japanese cavalry sword. I've searched the web and it's Japanese and not the Chinese version. Everything looks correct to my uninformed eyes, but there's no finger loop or even a place for one. There's no hole or stopper there. The handguard is just smooth steel there. Were any of these made without the finger loop?
 
Posts: 361 | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
I found with a similiar handguard on Ebay, although the one in the shop is in much, much better condition.

http://cgi.ebay.com/WWII-Japanese-Cavalry-Sabers-Sword-...ksid=p3286.m20.l1116
 
Posts: 361 | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of ORPO
Posted Hide Post
You are asking about the steel hilted Type 32 Army Sword. These are commonly called Cavalry swords but are actually NCO swords and longer ones were issued to the Cavalry but several branches wore them.

Early swords had the finger loop but later swords were manufactured without them. If there is a small hole or rivet in the guard near the grip the leather loop is missisng, if there is no hole or rivet it never had a loop. Look carefully because some holes were plugged by armorers when the swords were reworked and reissued.

I hope this is helpful.


"You can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself." Ricky Nelson
 
Posts: 4244 | Registered: 25 October 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Yes, helpful for sure. I was able to grab these photos this morning. I'm 99% sure this one never had a hole for a loop. Any idea what time frame these were made? I assume these were issued before the all metal handle NCO swords? Any guesstimates on value? The guy said he'd take $300.00 for it.



 
Posts: 361 | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of ORPO
Posted Hide Post
This sword became regulation on 3 August 1899. The sword with a 32 3/4" blade was issued to Cavalry while the one with a shorter 30 1/2" blade was issued to Infantry, Artillery and Engineer Sergeants. The serial number on the ricasso of the blade should match the one on the drag of the scabbard if I were to pay $300 for it. The sword is dated on the last photo of the guard but I cannot read it I am afraid.


"You can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself." Ricky Nelson
 
Posts: 4244 | Registered: 25 October 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
This was the 30 1/2" blade. The scabbard was a mismatch. I may go back and see if he if he has any wiggle room on the price. Thanks for your help.
 
Posts: 361 | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
A mismatched scabbard is a hard sell.Really hurts the value.I along with other collectors would not even want it.


"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to relive it" Santayana
 
Posts: 1496 | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of ORPO
Posted Hide Post
I agree with Zorro. This is a very common sword and I would wait to find one with a matching scabbard if it were me. I have seen matching ones sell for around $250 so it is not a bargain.


"You can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself." Ricky Nelson
 
Posts: 4244 | Registered: 25 October 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 


Site images not be used without our written permission.

Click to Visit