IMO (I do have several HH documents, also an original Degen award document) this is NO original document. First it is missing the name and other datas of the bestowed (these docs alwasy have/had these datas). Second it seems to be a ft best a faximile signature and docs at this early time (due to the certain printing style) always have an original signed signature. The date does not conform to this style of document. The date alswas was written with a typewriter. Looks (for me for sure) like a modern reprint. Regards,
wotan, gd.c-b#105
"Never look for sqare eggs" as an owner of an original FHH-dagger uses to say.
Originally posted by wotan: IMO (I do have several HH documents, also an original Degen award document) this is NO original document. First it is missing the name and other datas of the bestowed (these docs alwasy have/had these datas). Second it seems to be a ft best a faximile signature and docs at this early time (due to the certain printing style) always have an original signed signature. The date does not conform to this style of document. The date alswas was written with a typewriter. Looks (for me for sure) like a modern reprint. Regards,
