Hello Collectors,

waht can you say my is this Blade and the -

Motto god or is Bad?

Best regards
Sebastian

The "X" looks real to me.

http://www.fotos-hochladen.net/p0000002hm1ivwj0.jpg

http://www.fotos-hochladen.net/p0000003rdcp5nmh.jpg

http://www.fotos-hochladen.net/p0000004ecky3pq5.jpg

I do not believe this to be an original example but what do I know.

Gailen David

Gailen's right, 100% fake, no doubt about it.

Hello,

why does not feel well the Divise?
Can you explain it to me a little bit?


Sebastian

Go back and read some of the earlier post on Rohm daggers. This particular fake blade has been shown many times. I realize there is a tranlation problem for you but it will help you a great deal.

Gailen

so the whole blade is a copy not only motto?

Nevertheless, the Pliesspuren in themselves look very good or?

Yes the translation is not best sorry.
my Scoolenglish is not the best

This dagger seems to have suffered some further indignities as well. Look at the lower crossguard to grip fit.
Jim

Your English is alot better then my second Language (Pig Latin).

Gailen

Jim: Didn't need to go any further then the BLade.

is the blade a completely copy?

Sebastian

Hello,

is this blade now a complete copy or only the Divise?

Now I have looked in the forum everywhere for THIS blade.
If you can show me the contribution where exactly this blade is to be seen.

In nature looks the Divise just like the dedication.
So both is to same Time were made.
However, nevertheless, the blade in itself looks very good.

I am surprised and questioning.

Sebastian

I think the blade is a complete copy placed on genuine fittings. It looks like recent reproductions believed to be coming from eastern Europe. The overall quality is better than most, but the crossgraining and etches are not quite up to Third Reich standards. The inscription is especially noticeable as being not authentic.

Now I have looked in the forum everywhere for THIS blade.
If you can show me the contribution where exactly this blade is to be seen.

Sebastian

If you search under "Find" at the tops of most pages, you will find many examples of SA "Rohm" daggers depicted. Click on "Find," type in "SA Rohm" and you will find many photos and much information.

Hello,

i have search the Forum for THIS Blead

User Gailen David have writen :
This particular fake blade has been shown many times


I can not find this Blead in the Forum.
Sorry can help my?

Best Regards and Thanks Sebastian

I'm very sorry, I was wrong, it has never been posted. That solves that.

Gailen

I hope this is what you are looking for Sebastian . . . as there are a large number of posts on E. Pack full Rohm's, their maker marks etc. and, if I'm not mistaken, that E. Pack full Rohm's are one of the most frequently faked full Rohm daggers out there. Here is one link . . . hope this helps. ~ Ian

http://daggers.infopop.cc/eve/...573/m/9780047205/p/1

Hello Bushido,

yes your Link is good.

Here the logo has big differences to the logo in the link the hammer, the lines.
Were the logos of the Röhmdolche always immediately??
So the distance is able absolutely a little bit variable.
But, nevertheless, the logo in itself was always same for these daggers or?

They must understand I have got some annoyance.
In a German forum because I search a right answer!

Unfortunately, the pictures do not belong to me.
This does not feel well in itself.
But also did not forbid.

Nevertheless, I have to attract very big interest out why this is here then a copy.
Or why it is just no copy.

Nevertheless, the blade in itself looks very good.

The line about the Röhm is too short.
Does this of the matrix come?

The logo is very different to the known one.
Were there differences?


Please, help me to clear up this.

Sebastian

Hi Sebastian,

Here are four more threads which discuss at length the characteristics of E. PACK maker marks, real and fake. As I indicated before, it is a blade that generates a lot of debate due to the fact it was extensively reproduced. Regards, ~ Ian

http://daggers.infopop.cc/eve/...440028205#9440028205

http://daggers.infopop.cc/eve/...630024654#4630024654

http://daggers.infopop.cc/eve/...480049605#2480049605

http://daggers.infopop.cc/eve/...573/m/4570096354/p/1