Tranlsate German to English - Click here to open Altavista's Babel Fish Translator Click here to learn about all those symbols by people's names.

leftlogo.jpg (20709 bytes)



Page 1 2 

Moderators: Bernie Brule, Dave Hohaus
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted
Hello guys,

Would anyone know what those marking means on the tang of my SS dagger ?
Thanks !

 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
tang

 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
tang 2

 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
Close up of the second tang's marking.

 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of DONS
Posted Hide Post
These are the forgers TM ; Carl August Hartkoph.
 
Posts: 513 | Location: Rockport, MA | Registered: 28 October 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
That's real neat.
Is it common for tangs to be marked this way ?
It adds a bit of "personality" to my dagger. Wink
Thanks !
 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Nice ss dagger Pat,looks a lot like mine.Thats a good question ,how should my 1053/38 be marked,were all ss dagger tangs maker marked?
 
Posts: 976 | Registered: 23 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
A quick note on tang markings:
All the large Solingen makers had their own drop forge operations and they made their own blades in house. Hence there is no tang marking on the majority of blades. Many of the small makers had to get their blades drop-forged by an independent forger and these independents were also used for overflow work by the biggest makers at times. These independents tended to mark the tangs. I have an Eickhorn SS transitional(maker and RZM mark) in my colllection that has an independent forgers stamp on the blade.
Jim
 
Posts: 6683 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 04 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Thanks for the good info Jim,I got my 1053/38 apart and there are no markings on the tang,cant remember if the guy i bought it from said tang was correct or correctly marked,anyway i think i got lucky on this dagger being 100% ok because i really didnt do my homework before i bought it and didnt know a lot about them,this is a good informative site,iam glad i found it. Smile
 
Posts: 976 | Registered: 23 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Dave Hohaus
Posted Hide Post
I think that the subject of tang marks is a bit more complex and less understood than it appears. I need to check some notes and take down some daggers and I will get back to you.

Jim,

Please post the tang marks on that blade of yours.

Dave


Dave
 
Posts: 10174 | Location: Southeast | Registered: 09 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
This is the best I could do in taking a pic of the tang marking on my transitional Eickhorn:
It is a C and an A Enclosed within an H: So I'm guessing the forger was a firm called either C A H or A C H.
Oh well: In looking back above at Pats picture the forger is one and the same! Cool

 
Posts: 6683 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 04 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
Jim and Dave,
It is the same tang marking but WHY Confused is there also another "H" marked tang on my dagger ?
As stated by Don, the tang is a "C" and an "A" within a large "H", which stands for Carl August Hartoph.
Looked in Johnson's book and he says that this "H" marked tang is from Eickhorn.
Kind of weird that I've got 2 seperate tang marking, isn't not ?
 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
However: The marking on the other side of the tang looks like a pair of 1s to me:

 
Posts: 6683 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 04 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Houston Coates
Posted Hide Post
Raised tang marks are a very good thing. 99% of Repro blades don't have them. Many originals don't have them either.


MAX & OVMS Life Member, MAX Bd. of Experts. GDC Platinum Dealer. Collector since 1955.
 
Posts: 6859 | Location: U.S.A. | Registered: 06 March 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of wotan
Posted Hide Post
What I have learned, C.A.HARTKOPF has been the father in law from EICKHORN.
I think therefore EICKHORN has bought large quantities of his blades.


wotan, gd.c-b#105

"Never look for sqare eggs" as an owner of an original FHH-dagger uses to say.
 
Posts: 2934 | Registered: 14 July 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
Thanks Houston & Wotan:
I think we're all learning something in this thread. I'm also getting the impression from Houstons post that a lot more blades were in fact forged by independents during the 3rd Reich
period.
Jim
 
Posts: 6683 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 04 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
Real interesting and just love those kind of threads...........very educational.
The weird thing is that I've got a C.A. Hartkopf marked tang, along with an Eickhorn marked "H" but on a WKC RZM SS dagger.
Talking about sharing parts in 1938.
The tang was produced by C.A Hartkopf, then probably sold to the Eickhorn firm and was then resold to WKC, since these 2 manufactures were often sharing parts.
Neaaaaaaaaaaaaat ! Big Grin
 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
Pat:
Just for clarification here the RZM listing I have shows 1053 as being a number used by P. D. Luneschloss not WKC. We'll probably find out that Luneschloss was Eickhorns brother-in-law or something like that!! Cool Big Grin
Jim
 
Posts: 6683 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 04 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Pat

Picture of Pat
Posted Hide Post
Is "1053" from WKC or from Luneschloss ?
Wittmann's book says WKC but Johnson's book says Luneschloss.
Call it CONFUSING ! Confused
 
Posts: 5677 | Location: Canada | Registered: 05 March 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
Continuation of the CAH saga:
I thought I'd seen this mark before and,sure enough, It's pictured on a disassembled dagger on P. 146 in Johnsons Collecting The Edged Weapons Of The Third reich Volume VI. He shows a Max Weyersberg chained NPEA leaders blade with the CAH and The H as Pat pictured above. Both of these marks are on the same side of the tang.
Now here's where things get even more interesting: The crossguards with the same H stamped inside are pictured also. Is it possible that this firm did die casting along with drop forging?
Jim
 
Posts: 6683 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 04 October 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Dave Hohaus
Posted Hide Post
There is not a lot of good hard information on the whole subject. Here are some observations:

- Somewhere around 15%-20% of SS daggers have no visible marks and no signs they were ground off.

- Products from any one manufacturer are not always consistent. I have three Eickhorns. One is blank, one has A 17 and the other A 20. But both my Jacobs have the circle "A" as well, one with 22 and the other with 23. Lots of SA daggers seem to have that mark. Is that the mark of the forge, the owner of the dies, or the maker of the dies ?

- On the other hand, I have two Gembruchs, both with a "C" and a "3". Bokers seem to have the two headed arrow.

- A few blades have obvious symbols, but does that mean their forge or their dies ?

Dave



We think that the major companies had their own forges and some like Eickhorn did.


Dave
 
Posts: 10174 | Location: Southeast | Registered: 09 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of N.C. Wyeth
Posted Hide Post
Is anyone aware of an M36 (unmarked maker with chain hanger) with a tang marking? I have seen many M33's with markings on the tangs, but I have seen very few M36's with such. If you have any, please post pics . . . I am curious to see what turns up!


The happiest people don't necessarily have the best of everything; they just make the best of everything they have . . . .
 
Posts: 553 | Registered: 09 November 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
Here's my M-36 no maker mark.

 
Posts: 3816 | Location: Bronx , New York U.S.A. | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
M33 RZM 324/37 SS.

 
Posts: 3816 | Location: Bronx , New York U.S.A. | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
M33 Boker,early ground Röhm and later art deco maker marks have the double arrow.
Both of my M33's by klaas have no marks.

 
Posts: 3816 | Location: Bronx , New York U.S.A. | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of N.C. Wyeth
Posted Hide Post
That's another M36 with a new tang mark for me! Very interesting . . . I will post pics of one of mine soon to compare. Thanks for posting!


The happiest people don't necessarily have the best of everything; they just make the best of everything they have . . . .
 
Posts: 553 | Registered: 09 November 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Posted Hide Post
I have a unmarked 36 chained with the PDL stamp on the tang.they must of done their own tang forging.I tried taking a photo of it but it did not come out well enough to post on the site.Paul
 
Posts: 606 | Location: Somerville Ma. | Registered: 06 September 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Billy G.
Posted Hide Post
My Böker M33 has the same tang mark as Raymond's. I've always found these things cool, especially on an M36 when we really don't know who the individual manufacturer was.
 
Posts: 3037 | Location: USA | Registered: 31 March 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post

Picture of Dave Hohaus
Posted Hide Post
Bokers always seem to have the double headed arrow as shown above.

Raymond, your 324/37 SS dagger is a Klittermann & Moog. The mark on the tang is a combined KM that was stamped into the mold, so we see it backwards on the tang.

Dave


Dave
 
Posts: 10174 | Location: Southeast | Registered: 09 September 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post


Posted Hide Post
My unmarked M36 type II has a tang mark Identical to Pat's CAH! 3FL
 
Posts: 632 | Location: South Texas, FAR South! Occupied Mexico! | Registered: 17 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2  
 


Site images not be used without our written permission.

Click to Visit